2008 Rollback Numbers Released
The Iowa Department of Revenue recently released the 2008 rollback numbers. The following percentages are applied to computing the taxable value of a property:
|
| Residential | 45.5893% |
| Agricultural | 93.8568% |
| Commercial | 100% |
| Industrial | 100% |
| Railroad | 100% |
| Utility | 100% |
More information will be included in the League’s annual Budget Special Report and the topic will be discussed during the League’s Budget Workshop series.
To view the full news release from the Department of Revenue, please visit this page.
Cityscape, November 2002
An illustration of the effects of rollback
| |
Assessed Value |
Rollback |
Taxable Value |
Taxes |
| FY 2002-03 |
$105,000 |
51.67% |
$54,253 |
$439.45 |
| FY 2001-02 |
$100,000 |
56.27% |
$56,270 |
$455.79 |
| Difference |
$5,000 |
|
-$2,017 |
-$16.34 |
| Percent difference |
|
5% |
-3.58% |
-3.58% |
The end result is an increase in the assessed valuation by five percent, but due
to the rollback, a decrease of 3.58 percent in taxable value and property tax
paid assuming the same levy rate (8.10/1,000) was applied.
The city would need to increase the tax levy rate by approximately 30 cents just
to receive the same amount of revenue in the FY 2002-03 budget as received in
the FY 2001-02 budget. In our example, this city was at the $8.10 limit for the
general fund, so a tax levy increase of 30 cents is not a viable option.
A League legislative priority calls for a study of the state’s tax system,
including property taxes. A series of Q&A articles providing an overview of
the state’s current property tax system will continue through the next issue.
This article will address the assessment limitation order (property tax
rollback) issued annually by the Iowa Department of Revenue and Finance (IDRF).
The final article in January will address property tax exemptions and credits.
The League will issue a special report on property tax rollback in December.
Q: What is the property tax rollback?
A: The property tax rollback, or assessment limitation order, is issued annually
and limits the taxable value of most classes of property. Property in Iowa is
divided into classes based on its use. The classes of property in Iowa are
residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial and utility. In effect, the
rollback limits the taxable value of most property to a statewide increase of
four percent annually and eight percent for utility properties. This means that
even if property values statewide increased 20 percent, for the purposes of
taxation, they would only increase four percent. This helps shield property
owners from sharp increases in property tax resulting from dramatic increases
in the value of property. Although all classes of property can be affected by
the rollback, residential property is most significantly affected.
Q: What makes the residential rollback different from the rollback on other
property classes?
A: Residential property is subject to an additional limitation on the growth of
taxable value. The increase in taxable value for residential property cannot
exceed four percent or the actual increase in assessed value for agricultural
property, whichever is lower. The intent is to prevent either class from
growing faster than the other. For example, if agricultural values grow at two
percent and residential values grow at eight percent, residential taxable
valuation growth will actually be reduced and both classes will have a two
percent valuation growth. This results in residential property valuation
actually growing at a rate lower than the four percent allowed for other
classes of property. This additional restriction is referred to as coupling of
agriculture and residential taxable values.
Q: Why were the taxable values for agriculture and residential properties
coupled?
A: Legislation enacted in 1978 tied residential and agricultural valuations
together. The impetus for this coupling was a fear that inflation would cause
agricultural property values to outpace residential property values, resulting
in a shift in tax burden to agricultural property owners.
Q: Why is the residential rollback problematic for Iowa’s cities?
A: In reality, the feared shift of tax burden to agricultural property never
occurred, as agricultural values grew at a slower pace and actually declined in
some years. Coupling of residential and agricultural property artificially
suppressed the taxable value of residential property.
Q: Isn’t it difficult to compare agricultural and residential property?
A: Yes. In fact, under Iowa law the two classifications of property are assessed
based on two different methodologies. The assessment of residential property is
based on market value. The assessment of agricultural property is based on
productivity.
Q: Does the residential rollback impact industrial and commercial
classifications?
A: Yes. The artificial suppression of residential taxable values because of
coupling has resulted in an inordinate shift of the property tax burden to
classes other than agricultural, particularly commercial and industrial. City
officials and others concerned with economic development have long argued that
the rollback provisions in Iowa law actually hinder our economic development
policy.
Although residential rollback has seen slight increases and decreases over the
past decade, the general trend has been downward and now hovers near 50
percent. Other classes of property have remained at or near 100 percent over
the past 10 years.
Ten Year History of Rollback (all numbers are
percents)
Fiscal Year
| |
94-95
|
95-96
|
96-97
|
97-98
|
98-99
|
99-00
|
00-01
|
01-02
|
02-03
|
03-04
|
| Residential |
68.04
|
67.5074
|
59.3180
|
58.8284
|
54.9090
|
56.4789
|
54.8525
|
56.2651
|
51.6676
|
51.3874
|
| Agricultural |
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
96.4206
|
100
|
96.338
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
| Commercial |
100
|
100
|
97.2824
|
100
|
97.3606
|
100
|
98.7732
|
100
|
97.7701
|
100
|
| Industrial |
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
| Utility |
100
|
97.2090
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|